This excerpt from Germany and the Failure of Multiculturalism is republished with permission of STRATFOR.
Anyone could become an American, so long as they accepted the language and dominant culture of the nation. This left a lot of room for uniqueness, but some values had to be shared. Citizenship became a legal concept. It required a process, an oath and shared values. Nationality could be acquired; it had a price.
To be French, Polish or Greek meant not only that you learned their respective language or adopted their values — it meant that you were French, Polish or Greek because your parents were, as were their parents. It meant a shared history of suffering and triumph. One couldn’t acquire that.
For the Europeans, multiculturalism was not the liberal and humane respect for other cultures that it pretended to be. It was a way to deal with the reality that a large pool of migrants had been invited as workers into the country. The offer of multiculturalism was a grand bargain meant to lock in migrant loyalty in exchange for allowing them to keep their culture — and to protect European culture from foreign influences by sequestering the immigrants.
Read more: Germany and the Failure of Multiculturalism | STRATFOR
I hadn't realized how differently immigration of this sort was handled in Europe. Here, we've been seeing complaints about immigrants not learning English or otherwise not fitting in, reflecting an expectation that this is what immigrants should be doing. While it seems like it wouldn't go over well for the German government to proclaim a group of Turks to now be Germans after passing a test of language and civic knowledge, deliberately keeping them completely unassimilated doesn't sound like a good long term solution. That sort of multiculturalism doesn't work here, either.
ReplyDelete